Legal Opinion

Goldsmith v. Clabaugh

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 4, 1925No. 4256PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from a judgment for the defendants in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia on petition for mandamus and answer thereto, to which answer a demurrer was interposed.

By the Act of February 17,1923 (42 Stat. 1261), there was created “a board of accountancy for the District of Columbia.” Section 1 of that act prohibits any person, who has not received from the board “a certificate of his qualifications to practice as a public accountant,” from assuming the title of “certified accountant” or any abbreviation thereof. Section 2 defines a public accountant “as a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Turner v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Goldsmith v. United States Board of Tax AppealsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Alva Owen Hawkins v. Honorable Joseph R. Moss, Chief JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
  2. In Re Alleged Food Poisoning Incident, March, 1984. Abdulrahman Al-Zamil v. British Airways Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  3. Debruhl v. District of Columbia Hackers' License Appeal BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Cafritz v. Corporation Audit Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1945
  5. Corbett v. KinleinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API