Legal Opinion
Debruhl v. District of Columbia Hackers' License Appeal Board
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 9, 1978No. 10847PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Chief Judge:
Denied a hacker’s license by the Department of Motor Vehicles because of a felony conviction and subsequent parole status, petitioner seeks review challenging the constitutionality of the regulations establishing the disqualification. Respondent challenges our jurisdiction to review. Concluding that we do have jurisdiction, we reach petitioner’s constitutional contentions; reject them; and affirm.
Convicted of armed robbery, petitioner was sentenced to a term of confinement. In early 1975, he was released on parole. In the fall of that year, he applied for a hacker’s…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Rhema Christian Center v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Zander v. South Dakota State Conservation CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Fall River County v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- District of Columbia v. DouglassDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.