Gordon v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of Clark
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION DENYING REHEARING
2Per curiam
Petitioners Terry W. Gordon and John F. Sweeney seek rehearing of this court’s prior opinion denying their original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition. See Gordon v. District Court, 112 Nev. 216, 913 P.2d 240 (1996). As rehearing is not warranted, we deny their petition. See NRAP 40. However, petitioners have directed our attention to a few minor inaccuracies in our prior opinion; despite their immaterial nature, we now correct those errors.
*745First, in footnote 3, we inadvertently miscounted the number of grand jurors at issue. The opinion states, “This is…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Cannon v. TaylorNevada Supreme Court · 1972
- In Re Lorring's PetitionNevada Supreme Court · 1959
- Flangas v. HerrmannNevada Supreme Court · 1984
- Gordon v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1996
- Gershenhorn v. Walter R. Stutz EnterprisesNevada Supreme Court · 1957
4Cited by3 opinions
- Bahena v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2010
- Ducksworth v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- Bahena v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2010