Legal Opinion
Siegel v. Shell Oil Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 23, 2008No. 06 C 0035PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
AMY J. ST. EVE, District Judge.
In their Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs Michael and Rebecca Siegel allege that Defendants Shell Oil Company, BP Corporation North America, Inc., Citgo Petroleum Corporation, Marathon Oil Company, and Exxon Mobil Corporation are liable under the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act, 815 ILCS 505/1, et seq., and the Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, 815 ILCS § 510/2, for deceptive and unfair practices (Counts I and II), unjust enrichment (Count III), and civil conspiracy (Count IV). Plaintiffs also…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Montich v. Miele USA, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2012
- Vulcan Golf, LLC v. Google Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
- Gianino v. Alacer Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
- In re McDonald's French Fries LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
- In re Whole Foods Market, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2016
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.