People v. Kaminski
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum:
On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of burglary in the third degree (Penal Law § 140.20), defendant contends that County Court erred in denying his request to charge the jury that a witness was an accomplice as a matter of law. We reject that contention.
“An ‘accomplice’ means a witness in a criminal action who, according to evidence adduced in such action, may reasonably be considered to have participated in . . . [t]he offense charged[ ] or . . . [a]n offense based upon the same or some of the same facts or conduct [that] constitute the offense charged”…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. ReomeNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. BrelandNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. BaschNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. BergerNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- SAGE, MERLIN G., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- WEAVER, DOUGLAS A., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014