Legal Opinion

People v. Kaminski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum:

On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of burglary in the third degree (Penal Law § 140.20), defendant contends that County Court erred in denying his request to charge the jury that a witness was an accomplice as a matter of law. We reject that contention.

“An ‘accomplice’ means a witness in a criminal action who, according to evidence adduced in such action, may reasonably be considered to have participated in . . . [t]he offense charged[ ] or . . . [a]n offense based upon the same or some of the same facts or conduct [that] constitute the offense charged”…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. ReomeNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. People v. BrelandNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. People v. BaschNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. People v. BergerNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. People v. GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. SAGE, MERLIN G., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. WEAVER, DOUGLAS A., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API