Legal Opinion

Hummel v. Continental Forest Industries

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 3, 1991No. 1014 C.D. 1990PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CRAIG, President Judge.

Continental Forest Industries, employer, and American Motorists Insurance Company, AMA, appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Berks County denying the employer’s request to open or strike a default judgment granting benefits to Patricia Ann Hummel Marmarou, claimant. We affirm.

The issue in this case is whether the trial court’s dismissal of the employer’s petition to open or strike a judgment, for worker compensation due over a stated time period, is an error of law when the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board granted a supersedeas to the employer,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. M.D.S. Laboratories & Insurance Co. of North America v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Bittenbender v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Jarvis v. JarvisCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Town of Smithfield v. Local 2050, Inter. Assoc. of Ffts., 00-3650 (2000)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API