Legal Opinion

Moss v. Pardridge

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 29, 1881PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Elliott Anthony, of the Superior Court, sitting as Circuit Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, P. J.

This action is not founded on any statutory liability, but is based upon an alleged liability as at common law. The distinction between the liability of the owner or possessor of animals kept for domestic use or convenience; animals mansuetm natwrcs, such as horses, cattle, dogs and the like, and the owner or keeper of wild and savage beasts, ferae, naturae, as lions, tigers, bears, etc., is well understood. In respect to the latter class, the owner is conclusively presumed to have notice that they are vicious and dangerous, and if he neglects to keep them properly secured, he is liable for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vrooman v. LawyerNew York Supreme Court · 1816
  2. Wormley v. GreggIllinois Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Doe v. BarnettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Candler v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. Sickman v. United States (Two Cases). Ryal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
  4. Parsons v. ManserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  5. Indianapolis Abattoir Co. v. BaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API