Legal Opinion
Fred A. Whitaker v. State of California Lynne Yoshimara U.S. Department of Agriculture
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 23, 1997No. 95-17265Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
112 F.3d 518
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Fred A. WHITAKER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA; Lynne Yoshimara; U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-17265.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 21, 1997.*
Decided April 23, 1997.
Before: BROWNING, THOMPSON, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cato v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Beno v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Snake River Farmers' Ass'n v. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.