Legal Opinion

Cooke v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 28, 1932No. A-8293PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Custer county of assault with a dangerous weapon, and his punishment fixed by the jury at a fine of $100 and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 30 days.

It is first contended that the information is duplicitous. It is apparent from a reading of the information that the pleader was attempting to charge one assault with two different weapons. The information was not duplicitous, although poorly drawn.

The court sustained defendant’s objection to the introduction of any evidence, holding the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. . CaseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Moody v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. People v. PapeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Gidens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Beeler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1959
  2. State v. ForceCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API