Chamberlin Co. of America v. Mays
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
'Quillian, J.
We shall refer to the plaintiff in error as the defendant and the defendant in error as the plaintiff.
Grounds 4 and 5 of the motion for new trial complain that the judge charged the jury; “The court does not intend to intimate or express to you, by anything stated in the charge any opinion as to any disputed facts in the case, nor as to who should recover in the case; these questions being exclusively for you gentlemen to determine, except that the court charges you that the alleged levy of the execution, as shown by the evidence in the case, was illegal and the seizure of these…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Southern Railway Co. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Spence v. MorrowSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Georgia Loan & Trust Co. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Williams v. InmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Atlantic Company v. FarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Liles v. LilesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. J. B. Forrest & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Balasco v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- M & M MARS v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Mori Lee, LLC v. Just Scott Designs, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.