Balasco v. County of San Diego
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Presiding Judge.
1. "[Wjhere a non-resident voluntarily institutes a suit in the State, he submits himself, for all purposes of that suit, to the jurisdiction of the courts in the county in which the suit is pending. . .” Harrison v. Lovett, 198 Ga. 466, 469 (31 SE2d 799). As a general proposition this is true; initiation of URESA proceedings stands on a special footing however by virtue of Code Ann. §99-928a: "Participation in any proceedings under this Chapter shall not confer upon any court jurisdiction of any of the parties thereto in any other proceeding.” We had first occasion to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Millwood v. DeKalb CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Georgia Veneer & Package Co. v. Florida National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Florida State Hospital for the Insane v. Durham Iron Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Harrison v. LovettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Ohio Southern Express Co. v. BeelerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hethcox v. HethcoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Poss v. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Earley v. EarleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Scales v. ScalesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Balasco v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.