Legal Opinion

Nixon v. Wright

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1906No. Docket No. 26PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error to Eaton; Smith, J. Debt by Margaret Nixon against John L. Wright for the amount of a decree of alimony. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The complainant’s decree for divorce, made on December 30, 1895, contained a provision in her favor for $500, payable on or before October 1,1896. In December, 1905, an action at law was brought upon this decree. The defendant’s counsel demurred to the declaration upon the ground that an action at law cannot be maintained upon a decree for permanent' .alimony. The learned circuit judge overruled the demurrer, and rendered judgment for the plaintiff, from which defendant has appealed.

If it be conceded that an action at law will lie upon any decree in equity, which is for an ascertained and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Knapp v. KnappMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  2. Jordan v. WestermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Allen v. AllenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  4. Creyts v. CreytsMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Moross v. MorossMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Wells v. WellsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Mayer v. MayerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Toth v. TothMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Cogswell v. CogswellOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Wellman v. WellmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API