Legal Opinion

Housing Authority of Daytona Beach v. Gomillion

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 24, 1994No. 93-2900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue posed by this appeal is whether the tenant records of a public housing authority are exempt (by reason of the Federal Privacy Act) from disclosure otherwise required by the Florida Public Records Law. We agree with the determination of the trial judge that they are not and adopt the pertinent portions of his well-reasoned final judgment as the opinion of this court:

i\t sfc # % ‡

The Housing Authority declined to provide the Tenant Records because it asserted that the requested information was exempt from disclosure pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Privacy Act as set forth in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Forsham v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Campus Communications, Inc. v. EarnhardtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. Greater Orlando Aviation Authority v. NejameDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API