Legal Opinion
Reusser v. Wachovia Bank, N.A.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 8, 2008No. 06-35850PublishedCited by 208 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether alleged fraud in a state court home foreclosure proceeding during the homeowners’ bankruptcy can be re-visited in federal court.
I
A
In December 2001, Kenneth and Gertrude Reusser received an $860,000 loan from Long Beach Mortgage Company, placing as collateral a home that had been in Kenneth’s family for more than 100 years. Five months after receiving the loan, the Reussers stopped making payments. In April 2003, Long Beach Mortgage Company assigned its interest to Wa-chovia Bank, which gave notice to the Reussers that it intended to foreclose…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Celotex Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by208 opinions
- John Benavidez v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- N.D. v. Hawaii Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Mir Iqbal v. Tejaskumar PatelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Halicki Films, LLC v. Sanderson Sales & MarketingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Patricia Miroth v. County of TrinityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
203 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.