Dean Mathey v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1DissentVan Dusen, Circuit Judge
I respectfully dissent. In construing the trust instrument, admittedly governed by New York law, “ . . . it is the duty of the court to give effect to the intent with which the declaration of trust was made, so far as such intent can be collected from the whole instrument. (1 R.S. 748, § 2). And for this purpose reference may be had to the general scheme of the trust, its object and purpose as so represented. Knowlton v. Atkins, 134 N.Y. 313, 319, 31 N.E. 914, 916 (1892). See also Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co. v. Callan, 246 N.Y. 481, 487, 159 N.E. 405 (1927); Matter of Fields, 302 N.Y. 262, 97…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- George S. Krasnov v. Brendan DinanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- United States v. ByrumSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Todd v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
- Adele H. Dodd and William A. Dodd, Executors of the Estate of John A. Dodd, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- In re the Estate of PetersNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.