Legal Opinion

Tuscano v. State

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 12, 1970No. 45,872PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fontron, J.:

In September, 1964, the plaintiff, or petitioner, one Peter Paul Tuscano, was tried and convicted by a jury on charges of second-degree burglary and larceny. He was sentenced, pursuant to the provisions of the Habitual Criminal Act (K. S.A. 21-107a), to serve consecutive sentences for the two offenses. The present action, instituted under K. S. A. 60-1507, collaterally challenges the sentences thus imposed. The district court, after conducting an evidentiary hearing, denied relief on the ground that Tuscano had not sustained his burden of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  2. State v. MinorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  3. State v. WrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  4. Ware v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  5. Allen v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Schoonover v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1978
  2. Zimmer v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  3. State v. PencekSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  4. State v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1985
  5. Cochrane v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API