Sumid v. Cairns
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLyman, J.
The plaintiff, Nina L. Cairns, appellee in this court, is suing to have certain lands impressed with a trust for her benefit and for an accounting. The decree of the court upon findings of fact and conclusions of law was in her favor. The *599court found that in January, 1913, Herbert L. Sanderson, the father of the plaintiff and of Sadie B. Sumid, one of the defendants, and the wife of the other defendant, who are appellants in this court, deeded to defendant Sadie B. Sumid, the land in question, including an eighty-acre tract and two town lots. In form the conveyance was a plain warranty deed.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Speidel v. HenriciSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Guilfoil v. ArthurIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Tallman v. HuffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
- Wardman ex rel. Wardman v. HarperSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tovrea Land and Cattle Company v. LinsenmeyerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Simmons v. FridaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- City of Bisbee v. Cochise CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Masayesva v. ZahCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Hivick v. HemmeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.