Grice v. State

GUILLOT, Justice.

Appellant was convicted of theft of $10,-000 or more and sentenced to forty-five years in prison. He asserts thirty-one grounds of error. For the reasons following, we affirm the conviction.

In his first three grounds, appellant contends the trial court erred in overruling his motion to quash the indictment for failure to define “without effective consent,” “owner” and “deprive.” In Thomas v. State, 621 S.W.2d 158 (Tex.Cr.App.1981) (On State’s Motion for Rehearing), the Court of Criminal Appeals ruled that the terms “without effective consent” and “owner” in a theft indictment…