Paulscak v. Hoebler
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Maxey,
This is an action in trespass. The plaintiff resided on the first floor of a three-story building at 2201 Tustin Street, Pittsburgh, by virtue of a lease from the owner, who is the original defendant in this suit. The Pittsburgh Outdoor Advertising Company, successor to General Outdoor Advertising Company, was brought in as additional defendant on a writ of scire facias, on January 20, 1936.
On or about August 18, 1935, at 6 p. m., the sidewall of this building, constructed of brick, mortar and plaster, and facing on Moultrie Street, caved in and struck the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ashby v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- McGlone v. William Angus, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Bruggeman v. City of YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. Elmore & Hamilton Contracting Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1909
- Gerdes v. Booth & Flinn, Ltd.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Zanine v. GallagherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Stais v. Sears-Roebuck and Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Scurfield v. Federal Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Mann v. PulliamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- Parthenia Mercer v. United States of America and Jesse Gallman and Beulah GallmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.