Legal Opinion
G & G Fremont, LLC v. City of Las Vegas
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided August 10, 2016No. Case No. 2:14-CV-1006 JCM (PAL)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
James C. Mahan, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Presently before the court is defendant City of Las Vegas’s (the “City” or the “defendant”) motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 44). Plaintiffs G&G Fremont, LLC’s and Crazy Ely Western Village, LLC’s (collectively, as the “property owners” or the “plaintiffs”) filed a response (ECF No. 48), and the City filed a reply (ECF No. 50).
Also before the court is the property owners’ motion for partial summary judgment. (ECF No. 45). The City filed a response (ECF No. 49), and the property owners’ filed a reply (ECF No. 51).
I. Background
The present…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ricky Dean's Inc. v. Marcellino, M.D.District Court, D. Kansas · 2020