Legal Opinion

Hartman v. Gordon H. Ball, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 18, 1969No. Civ. No. 24721PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShoemaker, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal and from an order granting defendant’s motion for mistrial. The latter order is nonappealable but may be reviewed on appeal from the judgment. (Reimer v. Firpo (1949) 94 Cal.App.2d 798, 801-802 [212 P.2d 23].)

The complaint to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained on October 8, 1960, as a result of the *780negligence of defendant Gordon H. Ball, Inc., was filed on October 6,1961.

Defendant was served on September 29, 1964, and filed its .answer on October 27, 1964. On September 7, 1966, plaintiff filed a memorandum to set the case…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reimer v. FirpoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Holt v. PardueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Mastelotto v. Harbor Box & Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lyons v. WickhorstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Lyons v. WickhorstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API