Legal Opinion
United States of America,plaintiff-Appellee v. Richard Nathaniel Mattarolo,order An
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 17, 2000No. 98-10395PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Appellant, Richard Nathaniel Mattarolo, requests the Court to recall its mandate and vacate and reissue the amended decision in this case filed December 30, 1999, for the reason that his counsel, an assistant federal defender, admittedly neglected to file a timely Petition for Certiorari with the United States Supreme Court on his behalf after requested to do so by the Appellant.
The Opinion filed August 27, 1999, and amended December 30, 1999, is withdrawn and the mandate issued herein is recalled. A new Opinion is filed simultaneously with this Order. The mandate shall reissue…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Ramirez v. City of Buena ParkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Julio GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. HermanekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Mark Anthony MilesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Zula JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.