Bjornsson v. U.S. Dominator, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURKE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
This breach of contract action arises out of a compensation dispute between Emil Bjornsson and U.S. Dominator, Inc. (the vessel owner). Bjornsson appeals the superior court’s decision entering summary judgment in the vessel owner’s favor.
On appeal, Bjornsson argues that the superior court erred in not applying 46 U.S.C. § 10601 which requires that fishing compensation arrangements be made in writing in order to be effective. 1 We agree and reverse the superior court’s decision.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Bjornsson worked as a commercial fisherman aboard the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Carbone v. Ursich the Del RioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- McKnight v. DunlopNew York Supreme Court · 1848
- Hafling v. Inlandboatmen's Union of the PacificAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- David Stevens v. Seacoast Company, Inc. And M/v Elena SCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Shanks v. Upjohn Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Doyle v. Huntress, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Miller v. Arctic Alaska Fisheries Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Seattle-First National Bank v. ConawayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Miller v. Arctic Alaska Fisheries Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Nunez v. American SeafoodsAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.