Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lindie

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 29, 1941No. Appeals, 194 and 195PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadteeld, J.,

Mik Blazevich and Russell Lindie were indicted for burglary, larceny and receiving stolen goods.

At the trial the Commonwealth produced testimony that the smokehouse of one Albright, the prosecutor, was broken into, and hams and other foodstuffs in the process of being cured by immersion in salt water in barrels, were stolen. The meat was identified by Al-bright, and was found in the cellar of the home of Mr. Blazevich, Sr., father of Mik Blazevich, one of the appellants.

On or about January 24, 1941, around eleven o’clock at night, one Ruth Ebersole heard noises which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. NewmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Commonwealth v. ShiroffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RolanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. In the Interest of DelSignoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. In Re WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Commonwealth v. JoyceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Commonwealth v. WojdakowskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API