Legal Opinion

Town of Delafield v. Winkelman

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided April 2, 2003No. 02-0979PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

¶ 1. In this state, if a governmental entity is faced with a zoning ordinance violation, it may seek to penalize the violator by court-ordered forfeitures or it may seek equitable relief such as an injunction or an abatement action. But if the governmental entity seeks such equitable relief, the violator may request that the circuit court decline to grant the equitable relief based upon equitable reasons on the violator's behalf. So said our supreme court in Forest County v. Goode, 219 Wis. 2d 654, 656-57, 579 N.W.2d 715 (1998). Thus, the law is that a landowner may contest whether he or she…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Michelle T. Ex Rel. Sumpter v. CrozierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  2. M & I First National Bank v. Episcopal Homes Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  3. Forest County v. GoodeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Coopman v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  5. Waters v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Town of Delafield v. WinkelmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Ardonis Greer v. Wayne J. WiedenhoeftWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Village of Hobart v. Brown CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Village of Hobart v. Brown CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. CrowWyoming Supreme Court · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API