Legal Opinion

James Finta; Dina Finta v. Goldline Brands Inc.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided September 28, 2026No. 3:26-cv-05054Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 JAMES FINTA; DINA FINTA, Case No. 3:26-cv-05054-TMC 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 9 DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND v. DISMISSING CASE 10 GOLDLINE BRANDS INC., 11 Defendant. 12 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 Self-represented Plaintiffs James and Dina Finta seek default judgment against Defendant 16 Goldline Brands, Inc. (“Goldline”), a California-based winery group. Dkt. 15. The Fintas, who 17 were Goldline investors, allege that Goldline failed to honor a repurchase obligation in their 18 investment contract. Dkt. 1…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API