Legal Opinion

Natalino v. JMB Realty Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 28, 1995No. 1-93-2959, 1-93-2965, 1-93-2966 consPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Theis

This consolidated appeal arises from a $129,212 jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Mario Natalino, against the defendants, JMB Realty Corporation (JMB), Inland Construction Company (Inland) and Kelley Steel Erectors (Kelley), for negligence under the Structural Work Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 48, par. 59.90 et seq.). On appeal, the plaintiff requests a new trial on the issue of damages, charging that the verdict is inconsistent because jurors awarded him lost earnings, medical expenses and pain and suffering, but nothing for disability and disfigurement. He further contends that…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Maple v. GustafsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Hernon v. E.W. Corrigan Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Simmons v. Union Electric Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Luye v. SchopperAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  2. Branum v. SLEZAK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  3. Herman v. Will TownshipAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  4. Irwin v. St. Joseph's Intercommunity HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Kravcik v. Golub & Co., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API