United States v. Edward Frank Snell
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CHOY, Circuit Judge:
The Government appeals from the district court’s dismissal of an indictment against Snell. We reverse and remand.
I. Statement of the Case
Snell was originally convicted of attempted extortion in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951 and conspiracy to commit bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 2113(a). On appeal, this court affirmed the conspiracy conviction but reversed the extortion conviction. United States v. Snell, 550 F.2d 515 (9th Cir. 1977) [Snell I]. We held that Snell could not properly be charged for attempted extortion because “the bank robbery statute…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. Stacey C. Koon, Cross-Appellee. United States of America v. Laurence M. Powell, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Dominic Phillip Brooklier, Samuel Orlando Sciortino, Louis Tom Dragna, Michael Rizzitello, and Jack LociceroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. PersicoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- United States v. Harry E. ClaiborneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Gary James Taylor v. Lawrence KincheloeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.