Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Hilton v. County of Lincoln
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 12, 1926No. Nos. 25,753, 25,768PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Mandamus to compel the board of county commissioners of Lincoln county to levy a tax to carry out a contract for the testing of cattle for tuberculosis under L. 1923, p. 350, c. 269. Findings were in favor of respondents. Eelators moved for amended findings or a new trial. Eespondents moved for an amended finding of fact, but not for a new trial. From an order denying each motion, the parties appeal.
The order denying respondents’ motion is not appealable, and their appeal must be and is dismissed. Desaman v. Butler Brothers, 118 Minn. 198, 136 N. W. 747, Ann. Cas. 1913E, 642; State v. Brobst,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schulte v. FitchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Desaman v. Butler Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- State ex rel. Arpin v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- State ex rel. Tri-State Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mower County Board of Commissioners v. Board of Trustees of Public Employees Retirement Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Sims v. AhrensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925