Alabama Power Co. v. Capps
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
This cause was here on former appeal. See Alabama Power Co. v. Capps, 226 Ala. 362, 147 So. 156.
On second trial the court gave the affirmative charge, with hypothesis, for defendant.
The bill of exceptions does not purport to set out all the evidence; hence, this ruling is not subject to review. Sanders v. Edmonds, 98 Ala. 157, 13 So. 505; Sanders v. Steen, 128 Ala. 633, 29 So. 586; Clardy v. Walker, 132 Ala. 264, 31 So. 78; Stafford v. Jones, 224 Ala. 583, 141 So. 246; Federal Intermediate Credit Bank of New Orleans v. Faulk, 228 Ala. 621, 154 So. 606.
If error intervened in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Clardy v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
- Sanders v. SteenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
- Stafford v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Sanders v. EdmondsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Alabama Power Co. v. CappsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Byars v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Alabama Power Co. v. ByarsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938