Legal Opinion

CLEAN v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1996No. Nos. 63842-0; 63843-8Published

1DissentSanders, J.

(dissenting) — By judicial fiat the majority and concurrence virtually eliminate the people’s constitutional right to referendum by leaving it to the tender mercies of the Legislature. I would rather heed the warning of Chief Justice Marshall, "We must never forget that it is a Constitution we are expounding,”21 by applying the original text as written:

*822Article II

Legislative Department

§ 1. Legislative Powers, Where Vested.

The legislative authority of the state of Washington shall be vested in the legislature, consisting of a senate and house of representatives, which shall be called the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  3. Westerman v. CaryWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. RiversWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. RiversWashington Supreme Court · 1996

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API