CLEAN v. State
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentSanders, J.
(dissenting) — By judicial fiat the majority and concurrence virtually eliminate the people’s constitutional right to referendum by leaving it to the tender mercies of the Legislature. I would rather heed the warning of Chief Justice Marshall, "We must never forget that it is a Constitution we are expounding,”21 by applying the original text as written:
*822Article II
Legislative Department
§ 1. Legislative Powers, Where Vested.
The legislative authority of the state of Washington shall be vested in the legislature, consisting of a senate and house of representatives, which shall be called the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Westerman v. CaryWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. RiversWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. RiversWashington Supreme Court · 1996
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.