Legal Opinion

Cathron v. Jones

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 2, 2003No. 02-1296PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COLE, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner Andre Cathron appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus based on ineffective assistance of counsel. Petitioner claims that counsel was ineffective for fading to: (1) present two alibi witnesses, (2) object to certain hearsay testimony on grounds that the declarant had not been shown to be unavailable, and (3) request that an accessory-after-the-fact instruction be given to the jury. For the reasons that follow, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

I. BACKGROUND

Petitioner Andre Cathron was charged under…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Affronti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Arellano v. BrewerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
  2. Brooks v. JacksonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
  3. Cann v. TrierweilerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
  4. Cathron v. Jones, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Dionte L. Breedlove v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2026

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API