Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Bolden

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided January 22, 1960No. 13,250PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

HomeR Ferguson, Judge:

The accused was tried by an Army general court-martial in Korea and found guilty of stealing 18,240 pounds •of coffee, in conjunction with Private Ramon Aragon and Private Earl Lyons, •Jr., in violation of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 121, 10 USC § 921. He was sentenced to dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement at hard labor for five years. With some reduction in the period of confinement adjudged, intermediate appellate authorities affirmed findings of guilty of -attempted larceny, and we granted…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert William Maloney, Robert Murphy and Paul MerrickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  2. United States v. 5 Cases, More or Less, Containing "Figlia Mia Brand", Etc. (5 Cases)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  3. United States v. Charles Stewart TuckerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  4. United States v. WalkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  5. United States v. ShepherdUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. WorkmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
  2. United States v. LedlowUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
  3. United States v. MarymontUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
  4. United States v. BrooksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  5. United States v. MartinU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API