Legal Opinion
Iacangelo v. Georgetown University
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 19, 2011No. Civil Action 05-2086 (PLF)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
At the close of the plaintiffs’ case-in-chief, defendants Georgetown University and Dr. Vance E. Watson made an oral motion for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Rule 50(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court has already notified the parties that it will defer decision on that motion as it applies to Count I of the plaintiffs’ second amended complaint (medical malpractice or negligence). After further consideration of the parties’ arguments, the Court will also defer decision with respect to Count II of the second amended…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- District of Columbia v. WilsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- McCracken v. Walls-KaufmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Biomet Inc. v. Finnegan Henderson LLPDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Miller-McGee v. Washington Hospital CenterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Hinton v. RudasillCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Harvey v. MohammedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- North American Catholic Educational Programming Foundation, Inc. v. Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, PLLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Brown v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- In Re: In the Matter of the Fort Totten Metrorail Cases Arising Out of the Events of June 22, 2009District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- In Re Fort Totten Metrorail CasesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.