Legal Opinion

State v. Moses

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1981No. 808SC1207PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

For the sake of clarity, we shall treat each defendant’s appeal separately.

Defendant Moses’ Appeal

Defendant Moses first assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress the in-court identification of him by State’s witness Annie Mae Lee. Although defendant made no motion to strike the allegedly improper testimony at his second trial, he did object to the questions leading to the in-court identification. Normally, upon even a general objection to identification evidence, there should be an immediate voir dire hearing to determine the admissibility of evidence. 1…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. State v. HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  3. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. GreenleeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API