Legal Opinion

Saif Corp. v. St. Clair

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 17, 1995No. WCB 93-03298; CA A83803PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that awarded claimant a penalty under ORS 656.268(4)(g), because her award of permanent partial disability was increased on reconsideration by the Department of Insurance and Finance (Department). We affirm.

Claimant suffered a compensable injury to her low back. When her condition became medically stationary, employer issued a notice of closure awarding her 14 percent unscheduled permanent partial disability. The award was based on the range of motion measurements from an examination by her treating physician. Claimant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. SAIF Corp. v. ClineCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. Nero v. City of TualatinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. SAIF Corp. v. ValenciaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API