Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Valencia

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 27, 1996No. WCB No. 94-03439; CA A87028PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

SAIF seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that awarded claimant a penalty under ORS 656.268(4)(g), on the ground that claimant’s permanent partial disability (PPD) was increased on reconsideration by the Department of Consumer and Business Services. We reverse and remand for reconsideration.

The pertinent statute here, ORS 656.268(4)(g), provides:

“If, upon reconsideration of a claim closed by an insurer or self-insured employer, the department orders an increase by 25 percent or more of the amount of compensation to be paid to the worker for either a scheduled or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. SAIF Corp. v. ClineCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. Saif Corp. v. St. ClairCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nero v. City of TualatinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API