Legal Opinion

United States v. Grote

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided July 7, 1972No. 24,969PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Duncan, Judge:

In the ease before us, the request for trial by military judge alone (Article 16, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 816).did not contain the name of the military judge when it was submitted by the accused. The request was submitted in blank.

In United States v Brown, 21 USCMA 516, 45 CMR 290 (1972), we held this omission to be a jurisdictional defect (United States v Dean, 20 USCMA 212, 43 CMR 52 (1970); United States v Rountree, 21 USCMA 62, 44 CMR 116 (1971)), and the proceedings null and void. McClaughry v Deming, 186 US 49, 46 L Ed 1049, 22 S Ct…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McClaughry v. DemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. United States v. DeanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  3. United States v. RountreeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  4. United States v. BrownUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. StearmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  2. Lewis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  3. United States v. Montanez-CarrionUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API