Legal Opinion

United States v. Montanez-Carrion

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided July 27, 1973No. 27,064Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

In the case before us, the request for trial by military judge alone, Article 16, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 816, did not contain the name of the military judge when it was submitted by the accused. The request was submitted in blank (Appellate Exhibit I).

The Government correctly concedes error. The proceedings are null and void. United States v Grote, 21 USCMA 519, 45 CMR 293 (1972); United States v Brown, 21 USCMA 516, 45 CMR 290 (1972).

The decision of the Court of Military Review is reversed. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. BrownUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  2. United States v. GroteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API