Legal Opinion

Eadie v. Bohatch

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1992No. 626PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Fayette County granting summary judgment in favor of plaintiff/appellee Michele D. Eadie [Eadie] and against defendant/appellant Andrew Y. Bohatch [Bohatch]. We affirm.

Michele Eadie filed a paternity action against Andrew Bohatch, claiming he was the natural father of their son, Cory M. Eadie. Bohatch denied paternity. Eadie filed a petition to compel blood tests. See 42 Pa.C.S. § 6131 et seq.1 Bohatch filed an answer denying paternity and raising as new matter the claim that Eadie was precluded from pursuing the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. John M. v. Paula T.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Fedor v. Borough of DormontSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Smith v. BeardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co. v. Maritime Management, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Schickle v. McFarlinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API