Legal Opinion
Neering v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided July 25, 1958No. Civ. 3962-JPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, District Judge.
This cause coming on to be heard, after due notice, on defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and the Court having considered the entire record and file herein, the Court finds from the pleadings, affidavits and plaintiff’s deposition (taken July 3, 1958) the following to be the undisputed facts:
1. In the 1954 issue of the defendant’s telephone directory plaintiff had an advertisement in which there was an error as to telephone number. (Page 5 of Deposition).
2. Plaintiff had seven other listings in the same telephone directory which were correct. (Page 6 of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hamilton Employment Service, Inc. v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Baird v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Pepple v. RogersSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Riaboff v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Sutton v. CraneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Allen v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- McClure Engineering Associates, Inc. v. Reuben H. Donnelley Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1983
- Robinson Insurance & Real Estate Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1973
- ELEC. SEC. SYSTEMS v. Southern BellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- University Hills, Etc. v. Mountain States, Etc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.