Legal Opinion

Hunter Land & Development Co. v. Caruthersville Stave & Heading Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 17, 1928PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

Action in trover for conversion of certain timber. It is alleged in the petition that plaintiff was the owner of certain real estate which was covered with valuable timber; that defendant Carey entered upon said lands without right or authority and cut a large amount of valuable timber standing and being thereon and sold and delivered same to defendant, Caruthersville Stave & Heading Company. The petition further described the kind, amount and value of the timber and prays judgment in the sum of $1740.

Defendants filed an amended answer admitting plaintiff to be the owner of the real estate…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dolph v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  2. Puckett v. National Annuity Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Holliday v. JacksonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886
  4. Berry Ex Rel. Berry v. Majestic Milling Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  5. Ginnocchio v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dinkins v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Harris v. L. P. & H. Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. May v. BradfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  4. Tooker v. Missouri Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  5. Chamberlain v. Mo.-Ark. Coach Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API