Legal Opinion

State v. Piscattano

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided January 9, 1976No. FILE No. 35PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSponzo, J.

The defendant, after a trial to the court, was found guilty of all charges, larceny in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-123, evading responsibility in violation of General Statutes § 14-224, and failure to drive in the proper lane in violation of General Statutes § 14-230. The pertinent portion of § 53a-123 1 with which this case is concerned is the taking of a motor vehicle. The defendant concedes that if he does not prevail in the appeal of his conviction under § 53a-123 he cannot prevail in his appeal of the two motor vehicle convictions, since his sole defense to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. CariSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. State v. McDonoughSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  3. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Cruz SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. William Earl MooreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API