Legal Opinion

Junes & Spicer v. Advance-Rumley Thresher Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 23, 1932No. 20851PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This is an action commenced May 21, 1928, by defendant in error, herein referred to as plaintiff, against plaintiffs in error, herein referred to as defendants, to recover upon 21 promissory notes executed by defendants July 28, 1925, payable to plaintiffs or order.

The petition is in the usual form and contains an allegation:

“Plaintiff alleges that consideration for said notes was the sale by the plaintiff to the defendants of two l%r2 ton trucks; that the notes were not given for borrowed money; that there is no usury on said notes and the usury laws of the state of Oklahoma have not been…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Howard v. ArkansawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Rhome Milling Co. v. Farmers' & Merchants' Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Reynolds v. PhippsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Jones v. ToomeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Morrison v. W. L. Green Commission Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Biser v. BiserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Rorem v. BodineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Kenney v. NeumeyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Riddler v. KelleamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API