Legal Opinion
Busch v. Reserve Mining Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 17, 1987No. C0-87-1219PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUCE C. STONE, Judge.
Ray Busch appeals by writ of certiorari from a determination that he was ineligible to receive unemployment compensation benefits between December 1986 and February 1987 because he had received a pension payment covering those same months. We affirm as modified.
FACTS
The facts are not in dispute. Relator Ray Busch worked for the respondent Reserve Mining Company (“Reserve”) as a mechanical repairman until July 1986, when Reserve shut down its plant and laid off its employees. At that time, Busch was required to take two weeks of his accrued vacation, pursuant to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ackerson v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Evans v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Fazio v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Steele County Building & Loan Ass'n v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of the Commonwealth v. United States Steel Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shoreline Community College District No. 7 v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Gardner v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Shoreline Community College District No. 7 v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1993