Legal Opinion

Drennen Co. Department Stores v. Brown

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 19, 1925No. 6 Div. 347PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomebville, J.

Section 10379, Code •of 1923, provides that:

“When the claim interposed [in trial of right ■of property] is based on a mortgage or lien the claimant must state in his affidavit the nature of the right which he claims.”

In Hall, etc., Co. v. Haley, etc., Co., 174 Ala. 190, 195, 56 So. 726, 728 (L. R. A. 1918B, 924) we said:

“A claimant who fails to thus propound the nature of his claim cannot be allowed to support it by evidence of either mortgage or lien. This conclusion was announced by this Court in the case of Ivey v. Coston, 134 Ala. 259, 82 South. 664, cited with approval in Bennett v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hall & Brown Woodworking Machine Co. v. Haley Furniture & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Bennett v. McKeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
  3. Ivey v. Coston & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Choctaw Bank v. DearmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  2. Faulk v. DorseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Vest v. First Joint Stock Land BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API