Legal Opinion

Faulk v. Dorsey

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 26, 1936No. 4 Div. 871Published

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

The judgment for review was rendered on a trial of the right of property in detinue. Code, § 7403.

Plaintiff and claimant each, asserted title under a crop mortgage, made by the same mortgagor. Both mortgages were executed before the crops were grown, but after the first day of January of that year. Plaintiff’s was the senior mortgage, and was duly recorded.

The chief issue of fact was whether plaintiff had a valid mortgage on this crop.

It appears the printed form of mortgage with very extended coverage included crops of the mortgagor, J. H. Wise, to be grown “during the years…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Keyser v. Maas & SchwarzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. McDonald v. StephensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. Slaughter v. WebsterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. Houston Nat. Bank v. J. T. Edmonson & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Drennen Co. Department Stores v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API