Legal Opinion

Interstate Folding Box Co. v. Empire Box Corp.

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided January 21, 1933No. 261PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SLICK, District Judge.

This is a suit for infringement of patent No. 1,461,967, a process patent. The original bill charged infringement of several claims of patent No. 1,461,966, issued for a machine. The two patents, one on a machine and one for a process, were issued simultaneously. The machine patent, No. 1,461,966, has been dismissed out of the case, leaving only the process patent in issue.

Defendant claims this patent is invalid and void for the reason that it does not set up a patentable process, but only statements of a function of the automatic machine covered by patent No. 1,461,966.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Expanded Metal Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Corning v. BurdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  3. Risdon Iron & Locomotive Works v. MedartSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Interstate Folding Box Co. v. Empire Box CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API