Interstate Folding Box Co. v. Empire Box Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EVANS, Circuit Judge.
For want of a properly prepared and properly certified statement of the evidence, the decree must be affirmed. Not only has appellant violated Rule 9 of this court (Barber Asphalt Paving Company v. Standard Asphalt & Rubber Company, 275 U. S. 372, 48 S. Ct. 183, 72 L. Ed. 318), but it-has failed to secure any approval or certification of the evidence as being all of the evidence received on the trial or necessary to present the case to this court on the merits.
We have, however, acted on the assumption that all of the evidence is in the record and have overlooked…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Corning v. BurdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Risdon Iron & Locomotive Works v. MedartSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Barber Asphalt Paying Co. v. Standard Asphalt & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Interstate Folding Box Co. v. Empire Box Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1933
3Cited by10 opinions
- Arthur Sparrow v. Yellow Cab Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
- Miller v. ZahariasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
- Chiplets, Inc. v. June Dairy Products Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1953
- Kelly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Ludlow Manufacturing & Sales Co. v. Dolphin Jute Mills, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.