Morehead Banking Co. v. Morehead
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civil action tried at June, 1897, Special Term of Durham Superior Court before Timberlnke, J., and a jury. The facts appear in the opinion.
Read the full summary
Civil action tried at June, 1897, Special Term of Durham Superior Court before Timberlnke, J., and a jury. The facts appear in the opinion. Upon the verdict rendered by the jury, His Honor rendered judgment as follows : £ ‘ This cause coming on to be heard before E. W. Tim-bexiake, Judge Presiding, and a jury, and the jury having answered the first issue ‘ ‘in her representative capacity only,” and the second issue “no,” it is considered, ordered and adjudged that plaintiff take nothing by its action against Mrs. L. L. Morehead personally, and that she go without day. “It is further…
1Opinion
For the reasons given in the plaintiff's appeal, the judgment tendered at June Special Term, 1897, by these defendants, ought to have been rendered by his Honor. Judgment was (326) entered against these defendants at the June Term, 1894, of DURHAM, and of course that judgment is not intended to be disturbed by this decision.
Error.
CLARK, J., did not sit on the hearing of these appeals.
Cited: S. c., 124 N.C. 622; S. c., 126 N.C. 284; LeRoy v. Jacobsky,136 N.C. 450; Kelly v. Odum, 139 N.C. 282; Craven v. Munger, 170 N.C. 427.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wheeler v. Charlotte Consolidated Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Kelly v. Odum.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Morehead Banking Co. v. MoreheadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Morehead Banking Co. v. MoreheadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899